Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FDA rule on "Gluten Free" Labeling

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    FDA rule on "Gluten Free" Labeling

    The FDA final rule, issued August 5, 2013, permits a “gluten-free” claim if any of the following criteria are met:

    • the food does not contain any gluten-containing grains, such as wheat, rye and barley
    •the food contains a gluten-containing grain that has been processed such that the presence of gluten in the food is less than 20 ppm or
    • the food inherently does not contain gluten and any unavoidable presence of gluten in the food is below 20 ppm.

    In addition, if a food’s label includes the term “wheat” in the ingredient list or in a separate “contains wheat” statement and is also labeled “gluten-free,” then it must contain the following disclosure noted by an asterisk and in close proximity to the ingredient list or “contains wheat” statement: “The wheat has been processed to allow this food to meet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements for gluten-free foods.”

    I wanted to report an incident that I encountered regarding the new rule. Let me say first that I have not posted on here in quite a long time, as I have been strictly gluten free and doing very well. I have celiac disease. My last visit to a gastroenterologist involved an upper and lower scope and blood testing. Everything was excellent and my blood levels (don't ask me the tests) were zero. He was pleased that I have been totally compliant with not eating gluten, and does not need to see me for 10 years. Yeah! I had been scoped regularly every three years in the past.

    However, on a recent visit to our son in Cincinnati, I drank a new beer that my wife found at the grocery, labeled as "gluten free." It tasted great, but the next day I had severe abdominal discomfort and many visits to the bathroom. "Nuf said." I had looked at the label for the beer on the bottle, but saw nothing about gluten. After experiencing these problems, I looked at the carton. To my shock I saw that the beer claimed to be gluten free under the 20 ppm standard. It contained a statement by someone from the brewery who said he had celiac disease, and developed this beer using traditional brewing methods, but that would be gluten free under the FDA rule. My shock came when I saw that it contained Barley malt.

    I, for one, will not be consuming anything that makes this claim, and firmly believe that the 20 ppm gluten standard is not fit for celiac consumption. If you consider the amount of money that breweries, bread companies and others are loosing due to people avoiding gluten, it is no wonder that the FDA has caved to permit products to be labeled as gluten free, when they are not. Just my humble opinion.
    Last edited by Huddleston; 09-23-2013, 03:04 PM.

    #2
    Some celiacs tolerate 20 ppm just fine. Many celiacs show no symptoms eating a regular gluten containing diet. The celiacs that need help are those who are sick and have problems finding safe food. This ruling will cause more harm than good. I certainly cannot tolerate 20 ppm "gluten free" foods. I have problems with cross contamination of naturally gluten free foods. I know that lots of more sensitive celiacs contacted the FDA, yet they gave more importance to the opinions of GF food manufacturers. Does anyone read that Fasano study that is used to support 20 ppm being safe for celiacs? One of the participants, and there weren't very many, had to leave the study because of full return of symptoms. In whose book is that safe? It is a terrible shame. They ignore the needs of the sick celiacs for the convenience of the healthy celiacs. That's my opinion.

    Comment


      #3
      Tricia Thompson, RD - founder of GF Watchdog [a company that uses proper testing methods (not lateral flow devices) to test foods for gluten content] will be sharing her findings at the Intl. Celiac Disease Symposium this week. A large % of the foods she's tested over the past 2-3 yrs are below detectable limits (< 5 ppm). Just because food CAN contain 20ppm , doesn't mean it will.

      I'm not arguing for or against 20ppm ruling - just stating what is currently being found.
      Al

      Comment


        #4
        Al, do you know if that will be available to the general public? I mean without attending.
        Last edited by GFStephanie; 09-25-2013, 04:45 AM.

        Comment


          #5
          She told me she'll be releasing the results to GFW members, but I also seem to remember her saying she was writing it up for publication. I don't remember which medical journal. Often times, she posts important information on GFW website for non-members. Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register... or she'll post stuff on GFW Facebook.

          When I find out more, I'll post back.
          Last edited by aklap; 09-25-2013, 06:08 AM.
          Al

          Comment


            #6
            This has been a huge problem for us. The Gluten free statement that is used on items with 20ppm. Granted it doesn't mean that it WILL have 20ppm but someone who is very sensitive with celiac disease can get very sick. My daughter has had problems along the way with her numbers being elevated and being sick because of this. It is a real illness that can cause someone to be very ill and miss school and/or work or even be hospitalized.Even disclosure that it's made in the same plant or on the same machinery would be helpful(which some already do)l. These are products I avoid but not all GF labeled products disclose this because they don't have to, the ingredients ARE GF but the cross contamination can be enough to make a person with celiac very ill. I'm so careful at home about cross contamination, buying things that are already contaminated would make all my diligence useless. With this new GF labeling I still have to look for certified products which of course are way more expensive. Why not create a market that has a little more competition by asking manufactures to abide by certification in order to be labeled GF. It's still their choice to do so but maybe they will want to enter this ever growing market. Just my 2 cents...
            Mary G.

            Comment


              #7
              Of course if a member were so inclined, they could crunch the numbers on the 149 foods tested. 16 of which are not labeled GF. I started doing this very early on, but I never kept up with it.

              I don't consume much of the foods GFW tests, but I have found the overall results interesting.
              Al

              Comment


                #8
                For what it's worth, most of the home test results reported on Glutenzap also show levels below 5 ppm.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Well, I guess my point in starting this conversation is to caution against blindly relying on products labeled as gluten free. In the words of Ronald Reagan, Trust but Verify.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I agree with your point.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Have the rules changed? Here Tricia says that beer made from barley cannot be labeled GF in the US. There does seem to be problems measuring residual hydrolyzed gluten. Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register...

                      As far as relying on a label, there is no provision about testing being a requirement for using the GF label. It is nice that some companies do test and do get certified. That way it is more likely they will find any elevation in gluten and can take steps to correct this. There are companies that are trying very hard to make safe products. The FDA ruling does not go into effect until 2014.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register...

                        Tricia's info.
                        Al

                        Comment


                          #13
                          The beer I was referring to is branded "O Mission". You can read about it here: Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register... They clearly state that it is made with barley malt, and assert that it is less than the Gluten standard.

                          From their website:
                          Omission Lager is a refreshing and crisp beer, brewed in the traditional lager style. Perfect for a variety of beer drinking occasions, Omission Lager’s aromatic hop profile offers a unique, easy-drinking beer for those looking for a lighter and approachable beer style.

                          MALTS: Pale, Caramel 10
                          HOPS: Citra, Sterling, Mt. Hood

                          IBU: 20
                          ABV: 4.6%

                          Gold Medal
                          Awards: Gold Medal, Gluten Free Beer Category, 2012 Great International Beer and Cider Competition
                          Last edited by Moderator #7; 11-02-2013, 06:08 AM. Reason: I'm sorry this post took so long to be verified.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X