Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Reclassifying MS?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Reclassifying MS?

    In November 2022 Lancet Neurology published an article by some experts in MS research entitled "Multiple sclerosis progression: Time for a new mechanism-driven framework." It is discussed here:

    Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register...

    And there was a Webinar featuring three of the authors,* which I watched today. I was curious about just what new classification would be proposed--if any.

    As it turns out, no new classification was proposed. Some lists were made, and they agreed that the old classification scheme doesn't work well any more (if it ever did). What they seemed to be aiming toward is a framework that will enable neurologists to determine what MS drugs will work on which types of patients.

    The Webinar wasn't easy to watch as one of the speakers was difficult to understand, there were no captions, and there were slides with printed material that were difficult to read. However, this is the current classification scheme as they presented it--the scheme that they would like to replace with something "mechanism-driven."

    The chart showed MS divided into 2 main categories: Relapsing MS and Progressive Disease.

    Under "Relapsing MS" there are 2 subcategories:

    --CIS (for Clinically Isolated syndrome),
    which is subdivided into Nonactive and Active.

    --RRMS
    which is also subdivided into Nonactive and Active

    Under "Progressive Disease" there are 2 subcategories--PPMS and SPMS. These break down into 4 sub-subcategories:

    --Active with progression

    --Active without progression

    --Nonactive with progression

    --Nonactive without progression


    So this matter is still in the planning-and-discussion stage, and they are proceeding with caution because this change will affect how the MS drugs are prescribed as well as many other aspects of MS.

    It's notable that the classification process being discussed doesn't involve symptoms at all. And by "active" the FDA means "having relapses" only, while the EMA (European Medicines Agency) defines "active" as "having relapses or imaging features consistent with inflammation."

    -------
    * The authors include Alan J. Thompson, MD--and this is from Wikipedia:

    Alan J. Thompson, MD, FMedSci, FRCP, FRCPI, is Dean of the Faculty of Brain Sciences at Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register...; Pro-Provost for London at Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register...; Garfield Weston Professor of Clinical Neurology and Neurorehabilitation at the Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register.... He is also a consultant neurologistOnly registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register... at the Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register... working at the Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register... He is Editor-in-Chief for Only registered and activated users can see links., Click Here To Register....


    Last edited by agate; 01-26-2023, 05:43 PM.
    SPMS diagnosed 1980. Avonex 2001-2004. Copaxone 2006-2009. Glatopa (glatiramer acetate = Copaxone) 12/20 - 3/19/24.

    #2
    Agate, it would be wonderful to know which drug works on a person with MS. However, in my opinion they first need to know for certain which category of MS a person falls into. So far, in many cases it is only a guess. Then they need to be able to tell when a person goes from one category to another. All seems to be guess work.

    You get kudos for watching the webinar!
    Last edited by Virginia; 01-27-2023, 04:48 PM.
    Virginia

    Comment


      #3
      It looks to me as if the experts agree that MS needs to be reclassified but don't yet know how to reclassify it. I guess we can just stay tuned. Meanwhile, a lot of people are still thinking of their MS as RRMS, SPMS, or PPMS, with some variations on those categories.

      There has always been a question about whether anyone with SPMS or PPMS should be taking most of the MS drugs since their prescribing information clearly states that they're for RRMS. This apparently meant that the drugs just hadn't been tested in progressive types of MS.

      Now it looks to me as if they'd like to make sure that everyone with MS, even those with SPMS or PPMS (or whatever new categories they think up), can be offered an MS drug of some kind.

      SPMS diagnosed 1980. Avonex 2001-2004. Copaxone 2006-2009. Glatopa (glatiramer acetate = Copaxone) 12/20 - 3/19/24.

      Comment

      Working...
      X