I have the initial summery of my WADA that was performed this week. The summery of the two hemispheres are very similar. The Dr's (and I) know from testing (V-eeg's) that the seizures occur on one side, in one region. I may not have read it correctly, but it looked as if the two were VERY similar in frequencies and brain wave results monitored.
The piece that I can't fully understand, and due to it not being fully analyzed yet (?), is the text at the end on the report. It said 'clinical correlation is requested'.
I understand that means they want to compare the results of the WADA with my entire case history. I guess I was expecting something more definitive in the summery of the report.
I remember during the WADA speech was effected on the one side, however I don't know if that was assumed it would happen, yet there was not a notation of it. I remember when they had me doing the countdown from 100 backwards I couldn't speak properly after about 89 or so (when the amibarbital really kicked in). In my case, the speech was severely effected. I could think clearly, but not verbalize it. It came out as scrambled.
When they did the other side speech was not effected. I do recall not being able to see what was on one page I was shown. I don't know if it wasn't in my line of sight, or if it was caused by the electrical activity in the brain.
Any insight or comments?? Are WADA test reports hard to understand?
--Travis
The piece that I can't fully understand, and due to it not being fully analyzed yet (?), is the text at the end on the report. It said 'clinical correlation is requested'.
I understand that means they want to compare the results of the WADA with my entire case history. I guess I was expecting something more definitive in the summery of the report.
I remember during the WADA speech was effected on the one side, however I don't know if that was assumed it would happen, yet there was not a notation of it. I remember when they had me doing the countdown from 100 backwards I couldn't speak properly after about 89 or so (when the amibarbital really kicked in). In my case, the speech was severely effected. I could think clearly, but not verbalize it. It came out as scrambled.
When they did the other side speech was not effected. I do recall not being able to see what was on one page I was shown. I don't know if it wasn't in my line of sight, or if it was caused by the electrical activity in the brain.
Any insight or comments?? Are WADA test reports hard to understand?
--Travis

Comment